The Risks & Benefits of Triple-Net
(NNN) Properties
by Ray Alcorn
from creonline.com
One of the most popular property types in commercial real
estate are “triple-nets,” also known as “NNN”
deals. These are typically single-tenant retail properties
leased to tenants with high credit ratings on “net,
net, net” terms (hence the NNN acronym), meaning the
tenant is responsible for real estate taxes, insurance, and
all maintenance.
At first glance these deals appear to be the perfect investment.
They are typically new or nearly new, have no management responsibilities,
a long-term lease to a quality tenant, stable cash flow, attractive
financing, and the unique tax benefits only real estate provides.
The advantages have fueled a tremendous growth in demand
from investors on every level. They appeal to part-time investors
looking for guaranteed income with no management responsibility,
and they provide an attractive exit strategy for those with
mature portfolios. As with any investment, there are many
factors to consider in valuing and structuring the deal.
First, like frozen food, you “pay” for the convenience
of no management duties and stable, long-term income in the
form of lower returns than with a more hands-on, high-maintenance
project. Prices start in the range of a 6% cap rate for the
highest rated tenants, up to perhaps 8.5%–9% for lesser
credit quality or those with short lease terms.
[Note: A cap rate is the percentage of return on the investment
as if it were bought with all cash. The lower the cap rate,
the higher the price. See this article: Deriving Your Cap
Rate for more detail.]
Investors who use debt financing can produce leveraged returns
in the 10% - 12% range. But as we will see, income is not
the only determinant of value.
Second, and often overlooked, is the wide range of risk exposure
for NNN properties, even those with investment grade credit
ratings. Contrary to popular belief, these are not “risk-free”
investments, and in fact require a level of understanding
beyond that of more typical real estate investments.
Risk is always present
In evaluating any NNN deal, be aware that all “credits”
are not equal. A company’s credit rating is determined
by one of the three ratings firms (Standard and Poor’s,
Moody’s, and Fitch), and those with a rating of BBB-
and higher (S&P scale) are considered "investment
grade.”
Examples of the top-tier tenants include Walgreens (A+/Stable),
CVS (A-/Stable), Wal-Mart (AA/Stable), and Home Depot (AA/Stable).
Not coincidentally, these are also the properties with the
highest valuations (lowest cap rate), and they set the upper
standard for valuation.
Generally, as the tenant’s credit rating declines,
so does the price of their property. But the mere fact a tenant
has an investment-grade credit rating does not mean it is
risk free.
The ratings establish the relative risk of default for a
particular company, but no investment except a federal bond
has a zero default rate. This point is illustrated by the
following chart of default rates of rated retail credits over
a fifteen-year period:
Understand the tenant
To an investor assessing risk, this brings up questions pertaining
to the health of the tenant's business model and financial
strength and requires an additional level of due diligence.
Criteria may include the number of stores, debt to equity
ratios, operating margins, stability of management, and the
outlook for their industry sector. If you're thinking that
that sounds a lot like evaluating a stock, you would be right.
In leasing them your property, you are essentially providing
capital to the business, and their continued success has a
direct bearing on the long-term health of your investment.
Past history and future prospects are both relevant.
For example, drug stores are considered a growth industry
due to the aging demographics of the population. Well-managed
brands like Walgreens® and CVS/pharmacy® receive superior
ratings while Rite-Aid, another big player in the sector,
has had problems in the past and a change in ownership. Their
rating of B+/Negative reflects that history and a higher level
of risk.
Some sectors are more vulnerable to future changes, which
may pose significant threats to the tenant’s health.
As an example, rental video stores are in a precarious position
directly in the path of technology.
If broadband delivery of movies and games over the Internet
becomes the new paradigm, it won't make much sense to rent
hard-copy DVDs—or to keep operating stores that do so—when
the same product can be delivered without production, packaging,
transportation, and inventory costs.
As a result, the ratings of notable players, such as BLOCKBUSTER®
(B/Negative Watch) and Movie Gallery (B+/Stable), are well
below investment grade. There are also “sleeper,”
non-credits out there who may not have an investment-grade
rating, but are poised for rapid growth or enjoy significant
operating efficiencies.
DOLLAR TREE is one example of a well-positioned, well-run
company that doesn't even have a credit rating because they
have no significant debt. Yet their 2004 sales were over $3
billion with healthy profit margins, and they are opening
new stores at a rapid clip across the country.
But even with a thorough understanding of the tenant’s
business fundamentals, NNN due diligence is not complete.
Real estate rules still apply
Regardless of the tenant’s credit rating, NNN deals
are still subject to standard real estate due diligence, including
location, local market conditions, building size, quality
and use, and the lease terms.
The objective is to not only determine the current value,
but to quantify the best-case and worst-case scenarios for
the future, including the possibility of the property being
vacant, known as the “as-dark” value.
Obviously a property in a poor market or poor location can
be difficult to re-lease. A fact of real estate life is that
no two markets are exactly alike, so a thorough understanding
of the local market conditions and the property’s position
in the market is critical to establishing value.
Just as location determines its competitive position within
a market, local trends in population demographics, employment,
and income affect the marketability of a property compared
to similar properties in other markets. With standardized
lease terms and cookie-cutter buildings, the market factors
become the major differentiator between properties.
Specialized buildings (think fast-food restaurants and oil
change stores), even those in good locations, can hold significant
risks in the "as-dark" scenario. They can be very
difficult to adapt to other uses and often must be razed for
total redevelopment, lowering the residual value of the property.
Even standard “vanilla-box” type buildings may
require significant up-fit or refurbishment to be competitive
if the space is vacated after long use. These costs must be
accounted for in the overall valuation analysis.
The lease itself is perhaps the most important piece of the
NNN puzzle. It is the buyer’s responsibility to read,
interpret, and understand the lease terms, and most leases
are complex documents. They are always written by the tenant
and heavily biased in favor of the lessee. They can contain
land mines of unexpected expenses, cancellation clauses, or
toothless default penalties.
For properties with expiring leases or renewal options during
the contemplated hold period, the risks increase. Few investors
will consider closing a NNN deal without the counsel of an
attorney experienced with the specific due diligence issues
inherent to tenant-written leases.
Capitalized income value vs. as-dark value
Current practice for valuation of NNN deals is based primarily
on the capitalized income stream. As a result, actual cost
is often ignored. It is common to see deals priced at $400
per square foot and higher for buildings that cost $100 per
square foot or less to build.
This disconnect is often swept under the rug of the credit-tenant
lease, but if we look past the income stream to the intrinsic
value of the property at the end of the hold period those
warm fuzzy feelings can quickly turn cold.
Here is a real-world example:
As a case in point we'll use Dollar General® stores.
I do not intend this to disparage the company in any way.
They're a great company with a strong balance sheet, a BBB–/Positive
credit rating, and a business model that would seem to be
recession proof. I use them because their stores are popular
with investors and there are a lot of them on the market.
The standard Dollar General® building is an 8,125 sq.
ft. steel building on a concrete slab with a brick facade
on the end wall, typically located in tertiary and rural markets
on a one-acre site in a second- or third-tier location (i.e.,
a block or so off the main retail drag, or perhaps in a marginal
neighborhood, or both). Most would be considered "location-challenged."
Their standard lease has double-net (NN) terms. The landlord
is responsible for parking lot maintenance and dollar-limited
HVAC service—about $2,500 per year for both. Hence the
pricing is not as high as true triple-nets. Asking cap rates
are in the 8% - 8.5% range
They sign a ten-year primary lease term with three five-year
options. Rents range from about $6 - $8 per sq. ft., flat
for the primary term, with 10% bumps in each option period.
If we run the numbers in the middle of the income range at
$7 per sq. ft. rent, less $2,500 annual maintenance and Cap-Ex
reserves (about $1,220 per year), the NOI (net operating income)
is $53,155. (8,125 sq. ft. X $7 = $56,875 – $2,500 –
$1,220 = $53,155 NOI)
Using the upper range cap rate of 8.5% produces a sales price
of $625,000, or $77 per sq. ft. Available finance terms are
typically 25-year amortization, 10-year call, non-recourse,
80% LTC (loan to cost) with a minimum 1.2 DCR (debt coverage
ratio), and a fixed rate—around 6.75% in today’s
market.
If we put 20% in the deal ($125,000) and finance $500,000,
the debt service is $41,455, which yields cash flow of $11,700
for a pre-tax 9.4% leveraged return. For the typical passive
investor that beats mutual funds or CDs, or even corporate
bonds with a similar rating.
The lease has a corporate guarantee, and the depreciation
will shelter all or most of the cash flow kicking the after-tax
return calculation up to 11% - 14% depending on the tax bracket.
What’s not to like?
Dirt(y) thoughts
Well, I look at that deal with an old-time “look at
the dirt” mind set, and the worst-case scenario at the
end of the hold period. Unless the “dirt” aspects
are in line with the valuation based on income, the end-game
math is brutal.
If the tenant leaves at the end of the primary term, mind
set own an empty steel building that costs about $50 per sq.
ft. to build, on a land parcel worth maybe $100,000 with a
total developed cost of about $506,250.
Assume 2% annual inflation and the replacement cost in ten
years is about $600,000, less depreciated useful life of $125,000,
equals an as-dark, end-of-lease value of about $475,000 for
a steel building in a second- or third-tier location.
Call me a cynic, but that sounds like a future auto body
shop. But the question is whether the income over the hold
period offsets the low residual value. Let’s do the
math:
The cumulative cash flow over the first nine years is $105,300
(pre-tax). The mortgage balance will be about $390,000, leaving
equity of about $85,000, less sale costs of say 7%, leaving
$51,750 in proceeds plus the tenth year cash flow of $11,700.
The total cash flow and sale proceeds are $160,750, less
the initial investment of $125,000, leaving a total return
of $35,750, or about a 2.8% annual return and 4% IRR (internal
rate of return). Now we've got to wonder if a body shop can
pay enough rent to cover the debt service of a new loan.
Add to that there is no near-term or intermediate exit strategy.
Since the rents are fixed there is no upside value unless
demand were to exceed supply, which is not likely either.
There is a lot of the product available, and Dollar General
recently announced (12/05) that they intend to open over 800
new stores in 2006.
That’s a ton of new supply, and existing properties
will compete against the new stores with full lease terms
in the resale market. That rules out a quick flip entirely,
and any appreciation over the long term entirely depends on
local market conditions.
Now we can see that what looks like a sure thing is not so
sure. We've got some work to do in making our decision, and
thorough due diligence on the tenant, the market and the property
makes the difference between a great investment and an albatross.
Triple-nets DO have a place
I do not mean this to be a negative diatribe for triple-net
properties. My own portfolio holds several, and the benefits
are real. These deals can be a solid assets and well-positioned
to build wealth over the long term if you understand the sources
of risk, the overall marketability of the property, and value
accordingly.
Above all, don’t let the bright lights of a credit-tenant
deal blind you to the fact that it is still real estate and
the fundamentals do apply.
About the author...
Ray Alcorn is the Chief Operating Officer of Park Real Estate,
Inc. in Blacksburg, Virginia. Park was founded in 1953 by
his father as a development company to build mobile home parks.
Today, the firm owns and operates a diverse portfolio of
commercial investment properties. With holdings in the retail,
office, and hospitality sectors, the company specializes in
acquiring and developing high-quality real estate assets in
the southeast United States.
Ray generously hosts our Commercial Real Estate discussion
forum, where he answers questions and and participates in
discussions with other commercial real estate investors.
In his home study courses, The Dealmakers Guide to Commercial
Real Estate and The Dealmakers Guide to Mobile Home Parks,
Ray shares a lifetime of experience investing in commercial
real estate. The books provide real-world information written
by a true dealmaker, including how to identify opportunities,
determine value, how to structure deals for maximum returns.
These books are an invaluable resource for creating and building
wealth in commercial properties of all types.
|